LinkedIn Visibility Surge: Women Find Better Results By Presenting to be Men
Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.
The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility
Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.
Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Platform Response
Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.
Personal Experiences
Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.
"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.
Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.
The Method
- Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
- Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style
The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.
The Negative Aspect
Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.
"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."
Varying Outcomes
Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.
Broader Implications
These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.
Technical Explanation
According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.
Evolving Environment
According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."